Sustainability
Carbon transparency for our customers
A documented product carbon footprint for the CE20-500, built to the IMPA IMEF Standard — so shipowners get audit-grade Scope 3 data, not an estimate.
To Our Shiponwer and Fleet Customers
The equipment you buy shows up in your carbon accounts.
We want to make sure the number is right.
Shipowners are now being asked for verifiable emissions data by banks, charterers, classification societies and regulators. Most of what sits inside a vessel — pumps, motors, steel, paint — still gets counted in Scope 3 using a generic spend-based factor. That’s a rough approximation. It is also difficult to defend in an audit and impossible to act on.
DEN-JET has chosen to invest in primary measurement. The footprint of our CE20-500 is now calculated to the IMPA Maritime Environmental Footprint (IMEF) Standard, following ISO 14067 and the GHG Protocol. The result on this page is the number we stand behind, the method we used, and the assumptions we made — stated plainly.
If you operate a fleet and report on Scope 3, you can use this page as Scope 3 Category 1 (Purchased goods) or Category 2 (Capital goods) input data. Request the IMEF digital record and your carbon accounting system can ingest it directly.
CE20-500 · Electric High Pressure Water Blaster · 500 bar
Product carbon footprint
01
What this gives you
Audit-grade Scope 3 input
A defensible number for CSRD / ESRS E1, IFRS S2 and GHG Protocol Scope 3 Category 1 and 2. Traceable back to BoM, method and data sources.
Maritime-aligned standard
Follows the IMPA IMEF Standard v0.5 for maritime supply chains - the method your peers are adopting under Sea Cargo Charter and Poseidon Principles reporting.
ERP-ready data record
IMEF digital transaction record (19 fields) for direct ingestion into SAP, Infor M3, Oracle or carbon accounting platforms. No manual reconciliation.
Reduction roadmap, not marketing
Hotspots identified at component level (motor, box, pump). You see exactly where we're working to reduce the footprint — and when the next number lands.
02
Why this is better than a spend-based estimate
Most Scope 3 Category 1 accounting today uses a spend-based method: purchase price multiplied by a generic emission factor for the product category. The GHG Protocol allows it for initial screening, but recommends replacing it with supplier-specific activity data as soon as it’s available.
Here is the same purchase — one CE20-500 at a reference price of USD 5,500 — scored both ways.
SPEND-BASED · SCREENING ONLY
Generic EEIO estimate
-
METHOD
USD 5,500 × industry-average emission factor for "industrial machinery / pumps".
-
TYPICAL FACTORS
0.35 kg CO₂e/USD (USEEIO "pumps") up to 0.66 kg CO₂e/USD (EXIOBASE "machinery n.e.c.").
-
AUDIT DEFENSIBILITY
Low — result depends on which database the analyst happens to pick.
-
ACTIONABLE
No — does not identify where the emissions actually sit.
-
GHG PROTOCOL HIERARCHY
Screening level. Should be replaced when supplier data is available.
SPEND-BASED · SCREENING ONLY
DEN-JET PCF (this disclosure)
-
METHOD
Cradle-to-gate LCA under IMEF v0.5, ISO 14067 and GHG Protocol Product Standard.
-
TYPICAL FACTORS
Product-level Bill of Materials + ecoinvent 3.10 + DEN-JET manufacturing data, 2025.
-
AUDIT DEFENSIBILITY
Full method, assumptions and background data disclosed. Ready for thirdparty verification.
-
ACTIONABLE
Yes — three component hotspots (motor, box, pump = 82 % of footprint) identified.
-
GHG PROTOCOL HIERARCHY
Supplier-specific data. The preferred method in the Scope 3 Standard.
For a fleet operator buying 40 CE20-500 units per year, switching from a spend-based estimate to this activity-based PCF replaces a wide uncertainty range of
roughly 77 – 145 tonnes CO₂e with a single, defensible figure of ≈ 55 tonnes CO₂e — and removes a recurring audit finding from your Scope 3 Category 1 disclosure.
Note: the USD 5,500 reference price and the 40-units-per-year fleet figure are illustrative. Your own price and volumes apply. Emission factors cited: USEEIO v2.0 and EXIOBASE
3.8, GHG Protocol Scope 3 Evaluator guidance.
03
What we measured
A1
A2
A3
Manufacturing
A4
A5
- Included in the 1,367 kg CO₂e figure
- Out of scope for this cradle-to-gate figure
04
Where the emissions come from
Motor
617 kg · 45.1%
Box / cover
Pump
Frame
143 kg · 10.5%
Electricity (A3)
Tank, cable, packaging
05
Method and standards
Standards applied
IMPA Maritime Environmental Footprint (IMEF) Standard
v0.5, ISO 14040 / 14044 / 14067, GHG Protocol Product
Standard, with IPCC AR6 GWP100 characterisation.
FUNCTIONAL UNIT | One (1) CE20-500 unit, 164.5 kg |
SYSTEM BOUNDARY | Cradle-to-gate (IMEF A1–A3) |
BACKGROUND DATA | ecoinvent 3.10, cut-off system model |
IMPACT METHOD | ReCiPe 2016 v1.1 Midpoint (H) · IPCC AR6 GWP100 |
REFERENCE PERIOD | 2025 production data |
REPORT ISSUED | 21 July 2025 |
PERFORMED BY | ReFlow ApS — Carbon Footprint Software & Advisory |
VERIFICATION STATUS | Self-declared. Third-party verification planned 2026. |
06
Data quality — stated plainly
/5
Tier 2 — Basic
What this means for you. The result is fit for hotspot analysis and for Scope 3 reporting at the current CSRD/ESRS E1 level of precision. Read with an uncertainty band of roughly ±20–30 % at the total level.
What will improve it. Supplier-specific EPDs for the motor, box and pump (our three largest contributors), and primary energy data for A3.
Planned next update. Target quality score ≥ 3.5, with third-party verification, in the next revision.
07
What this number is — and is not
Carbon disclosures are often dressed up with language that isn’t supported by the underlying figure. We’d rather be useful than impressive.
IT IS
IT IS NOT
08
Our reduction roadmap
01 · By Q4 2026
Supplier primary data
Collect supplier EPDs or primary LCA data for the motor, box and pump. These three items carry 82 % of the current footprint.
02 · By Q2 2027
Manufacturing energy switch
03 · By end 2027
